The Other Side

  • Italia Louisiana
Tráiler

Sinopsis(1)

En un territorio invisible, al margen de la sociedad, en el límite entre la ilegalidad y la anarquía, vive una comunidad afligida que hace frente a una amenaza: caer en el olvido. Veteranos sin armas, adolescentes taciturnos, drogadictos que buscan en el amor una salida a su dependencia, antiguos combatientes de las fuerzas especiales que siguen en guerra con el mundo, mujeres jóvenes y futuras madres a la deriva, viejos que no han perdido el gusto por la vida. En esta humanidad escondida, se abren los abismos de la América de hoy en día. (Cannes Film Festival)

(más)

Videos (1)

Tráiler

Reseñas (1)

Matty 

todas reseñas del usuario

inglés Minervini is an example of a hybrid filmmaker (in Italy, other examples include Alessandro Comodin, Michelangelo Frammartino and, to some extent, Gianfranco Rosi), whose films are too much in the style of documentaries to be fiction and, at the same time, have too many staged moments to be pure documentaries. As in the preceding Texas trilogy, in The Other Side non-actors perform scenes that are more or less inspired by their real lives and subsequently arranged into a relatively cohesive narrative (while the staged scenes often serve to connect them). It is thus a combination of documentary observation with collective dramaturgy (Jean Rouch used something similar, “collective anthropology”, in the past). Besides Minervini, the crew comprised only three other people (cameraman, sound engineer and second assistant camera), who attempted to communicate with each other without the use of film jargon in order not to have the effect of being foreign elements and thus to fit into the given environment. The film was shot with a digital camera without interruption (until the disk capacity ran out), without artificial lighting and without changing lenses. With his disarming straightforwardness, empathetic approach and method of filming, Minervini breaks down the notional wall between the creator and the (social) actor and lets the actors reveal themselves. His unsentimental and non-judgmental viewpoint is not subordinated to an attempt to confirm or refute any particular opinion. He also takes a neutral position in the case of two drug addicts and members of a far-right militia (their thoughts and sources of frustration are in many ways similar – just as one half of the film complements the other). The social context is not determinative for him. He mainly wants to understand the emotions of the characters and the relationships between them. Thanks to that, he offers an unpleasantly intimate insight into the world of people who live on the periphery of middle-class America, but there is an ever-increasing number of them and they are increasingly vocal and have greater influence (because they speak and think like their current president) and we obviously should try to understand them if we want to comprehend what is happening with society as such. 75% ()

Galería (12)