Director:
Clint EastwoodGuión:
Brian HelgelandCámara:
Tom SternMúsica:
Lennie NiehausReparto:
Clint Eastwood, Jeff Daniels, Anjelica Huston, Wanda De Jesus, Tina Lifford, Paul Rodriguez, Dylan Walsh, Rick Hoffman, Glenn Morshower, Greg Stechman (más)Streaming (3)
Sinopsis(1)
Terry McCaleb es un veterano investigador del FBI. Es implacable en su búsqueda de justicia y no tiene rival para seguir la pista a los asesinos y atraparlos. Pero cuando empieza a cerrar a su último adversario - un psicópata apodado "el asesino del código"- McCaleb sufre un infarto y se ve forzado a la jubilación anticipada. Dos años más tarde y tras recibir un corazón nuevo, una hermosa desconocida le revela un secreto que le obliga a reconsiderar su reincorporación: su vida fue salvada por la muerte de otra persona, la víctima de un asesino que sigue libre. (Warner Bros. España)
(más)Videos (1)
Reseñas (4)
Un misterio de la vieja escuela y algo predecible con un punto más o menos satisfactorio. La película se mantiene a flote gracias al carisma de Clint Eastwood, pero habría encajado mejor con Jack Nicholson guiado por Sean Penn como director. La película se mantiene a flote gracias al carisma de Clint, pero habría quedado mejor con Jack Nicholson, guiado por Sean Penn como director.
()
A very unnecessary crime film in which a seventy-year-old Eastwood searches for an easily predictable killer with bulldog determination and even manages to acquire a partner many decades younger. I simply don't buy into this from the creators. Thankfully, Clint himself is behind the direction, so the pace hardly ever slackens, but everything is too predictable and visually surprisingly sterile.
()
As I've mentioned in many reviews, Michael Connelly is one of my favorite crime authors. However, movies and series based on his books often miss the mark, lacking the captivating storylines and logic that make his novels feel like a quality Swiss watch. I struggle to understand why screenwriters feel the need to "enhance" stories that are already so well-crafted. In this case, yes, the story was altered to fit a certain duration, but why the unnecessary additional changes? For example, I couldn’t wrap my head around why they completely changed the identity of the main villain. It just didn’t make any sense. And Terrell McCaleb? Based on Connelly's description, I imagined him differently. Clint Eastwood, whom I usually love, didn't quite fit the role. The story in this form didn’t work out well in terms of acting or directing, and I can only console myself with the thought that it could have been worse. / Lesson learned: Call an ambulance before you need to. You never know...
()
The ideal three-star film, simply average, it doesn't suck or impress. The viewer spends a pleasant 110 minutes in the company of a guy with a heart transplant, Clint, who shows that he hasn't forgotten how to direct, although in this case he doesn't perform any miracles. True, the villain didn’t have to be so easily predictable, but in a one-view film, that's not a problem.
()
Anuncio