La matanza de Texas

  • Estados Unidos The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (más)
Tráiler

Sinopsis(1)

El 20 de agosto de 1973 la policía se desplazó a una granja de Texas propiedad de un antiguo empleado en un matadero; en ella se encontraron los cuerpos sin vida de treinta y tres personas. El asesino, conocido como "Leatherface", apareció en las portadas de los periódicos blandiendo una sierra mecánica y con la cara tapada con una máscara hecha de la piel de sus víctimas. La policia acusó del asesinato a un hombre que llevaba una máscara de cuero, le condenaron a morir y archivaron el caso. Sin embargo, muchas personas relacionadas con los espantosos crímenes acusaron a la policia de haber hecho una chapuza y culpar al hombre equivocado. Ahora por primera vez, el único superviviente conocido de la matanza ha roto su silencio para contar la verdad acerca de lo ocurrido en la carretera desierta de Texas, cuando un grupo de cinco jóvenes tuvo que enfrentarse a un loco armado con una sierra mecánica, el mismo que dejó una oleada de sangre y terror que se conocería como "La matanza de Texas". (Universal Pictures España)

(más)

Reseñas (7)

POMO 

todas reseñas del usuario

español Entretenimiento puramente superficial e interesado. El director Marcus Nispel es un videógrafo, capaz de captar espectacularmente cosas de nulo valor narrativo. La fotografía y sus filtros de color recuerdan a David Fincher y, junto con la música oscura, contribuyen a la sensación de oscuridad densa. Pero la nula gradación de la trama, los sustos que no funcionan y la falta de misterio recuerdan más la obra del productor italiano de películas basuras de la década de 1970 (por ejemplo, Joe D'Amato). Además, la película es extremadamente espeluznante. Seven también me disgustó de la misma manera, pero al mismo tiempo me deleitó con un guión maravillosamente sobrecargado y rematado y una idea profunda. La matanza de Texas me dio asco y me dio una patada como si fuera una de sus víctimas. ()

Lima 

todas reseñas del usuario

inglés The bleakness of the backwoods setting, where you’d only stop if your car broke down could, be felt much more intensely in the original, but Nispel's film has a certain amount of atmosphere. The casting is pretty good, the representatives of the local rednecks and brutes are really disgusting and their appearance and behaviour adds to the film's impact. But while watching Hooper's original I felt horror, dismay and disgust at Leatherface's family, that panopticon of creepy creatures, Nispel's film didn't produce similarly intense feelings. Some scenes looked spectacular, but they were quite illogical, and the final chase did not avoid the clichés that have been repeated countless times. Leatherface in Hooper's film was a believable character, a weirdo with a rather perverted hobby; Nispel's swung his chainsaw too much, making his behaviour seem unnatural and out of touch with reality. I guess that's why I wasn't scared, there was no deeper experience and Nispel's film became in my eyes just one of many teenage slashers. ()

novoten 

todas reseñas del usuario

inglés At the moment when the camera goes through a hole in a bullet and it's neither cool nor impressive, but just unnecessarily disgusting, I should have realized that the whole movie would be like that. From minor gossip emerged a total disaster with relentlessly annoying characters, only one powerful scene, and one stolen Blair Witch. 30% ()

Kaka 

todas reseñas del usuario

inglés The upsides are the solid cinematography and editing, which make the film quite raw and brutal - something where the director goes a bit too far at times. ()

D.Moore 

todas reseñas del usuario

inglés So: A chilling atmosphere, constant tension, ever-present fear... None of that is in the new Texas Chainsaw Massacre. One star was earned by the music, the other by the bright exceptions (about two scenes that really had something to them). An unnecessary remake. What struck me, however, is that the film is set in 1973, but you can't really tell. Odd. ()

lamps 

todas reseñas del usuario

inglés As a stand-alone contribution to the genre, it’s barely average; as the remake of the horror legend that kick started the genre and remains flawless, it’s awful. In the original, every decision of the characters and stylistic choice had an unshakable position in the overall system and the atmosphere; in this one, the characters behave very stupidly and the violence and most of the editing feel overly stylised, killing all the naturalism and the potential of the harsh Texan setting. Only the male audience will be in danger, because after seeing the scantily clad and sweaty Jessica Biel they may feel their pants very tight. That, plus some interesting ideas and the traditionally good Ermey are the only things worthy of attention. ()

kaylin 

todas reseñas del usuario

inglés "The Texas Chainsaw Massacre" is simply just a remake, and for me, a remake in the worst sense of the word. A film that only tries to "update" an older movie for contemporary times. But when you look at the original film, you still understand that it is much better, has a better atmosphere, and is much more terrifying. And Leatherface also looks more menacing, partly because we never see its true face. ()