Sinopsis(1)

En el año 3000, la Tierra no es más que un desierto y la humanidad una especie en vías de extinción. Mil años antes, los feroces Psychlos invadieron nuestro planeta, destruyeron sus defensas, arrasaron sus ciudades y abolieron sus instituciones. El jefe de seguridad de los Psychlos, Terl, es uno de los personajes más temibles de esta Tierra salvaje. En mitad de las Montañas Rocosas vive un joven y heroico cazador, Jonnie Goodboy Tyler, decidido a devolverles la esperanza y la dignidad a los suyos. Al ser capturado, se une a la cohorte de esclavos de Terl. (Warner Bros. España)

(más)

Reseñas (7)

Lima ¡Boo!

todas reseñas del usuario

inglés Scientology superstar Travolta smashed the piggy bank, donned a costume that would make him a first-class carnival attraction, and helped create a tribute to his guru, the founder of the Church of Scientology, L.R. Hubbard. This case, more than any other, shows that you can't make a good film out of an extremely crappy book. Especially when behind the camera is a man whose creative impotence is admirable and who can only manage to steal (or should I call it quote?) scenes from famous science fiction works (e.g. the slow-motion passage through the glass panes after being hit by a bullet is the blatant agony of the replicant Zhora from Scott's Blade Runner). Too bad the Church of Scientology itself hasn't been as "successful" as this piece of crap by Travolta, there would be one less influential zealot. ()

Isherwood ¡Boo!

todas reseñas del usuario

inglés Scott's imagination, Cameron's industrial design, and Besson's bizarreness meet in an acid mix that etches not only formal classics but also the audience’s good taste, with a poor script devoid of any proper logic or meaningful justification. If it didn’t take itself so deadly seriously, you’d think how cool those Scientologists are when they blow over $70 million for a good laugh, but I kind of like them that way. :) ()

3DD!3 ¡Boo!

todas reseñas del usuario

inglés I was not able to finish it. Weird script, awful dialogues, but it's all pretty messed up in terms of filmmaking, starting with the bad editing, and ending with the terrible visual effects. Yes I could have mocked Travolta the whole film, but I quite like him as an actor and was rather sorry. Not even rum could help. ()

D.Moore 

todas reseñas del usuario

inglés For the effects, for the idea of a post-apocalyptic world with rastas piloting harriers, and for the funny John Travolta (I have a soft spot for his bad guys), who clearly didn't take the whole thing too seriously. ()

lamps ¡Boo!

todas reseñas del usuario

inglés I’m giving this film a Boo!, but I still highly recommend it to all of you. If you thought you've seen everything from cult gems to Uwe Boll's stinkiest shit, Battlefield Earth will prove you wrong. Both scriptwriters should be subjected to a thorough mental examination to see if they really meant it, or if they were just cruelly taking the piss out of all of us and the actors, too. But I'm afraid they really meant it, as did the film's producer and "brightest star" John Travolta, who supposedly took this pile of crap to the skies in public. And that's actually what bothered me the most about it. I was expecting it to be rubbish, but the fact that it pretended to be incredibly cool sci-fi and a hot competitor to The Matrix or 12 Monkeys pissed me off immensely and cemented the Boo! rating. I just don't understand how Travolta was able to lure in actors like Pepper and Whitaker when the film had no budget and looks so insanely amateurish in every aspect – terrible cinematography, editing, awful effects and absolutely horrible make-up that induced fits of laughter. Travolta tries to look tough and delivers one-liners like a proper bad guy, but his style of humour is probably the saddest in history, as well as his dreadlocks and computer gun (it's a good thing I didn't see it in the original, Trávníček's dubbing at least gave it some verve). The action scenes made me downright sick, instead being over in, say, a minute, the slow-motion shots stretched them to two. But like I’ve said, you have to see it for yourselves, because there's no way to adequately describe this. 15% ()

Goldbeater 

todas reseñas del usuario

español Si existiera un premio para películas con el mayor uso de tomas de cámara de ángulo holandés y posiblemente un uso excesivo de cámara lenta, Campo de batalla: la tierra sería la ganadora sin lugar a duda. Simplemente no existe una exageración artificial visualmente más dolorosa que ésta. Y si existiera, no quisiéramos verla. La suprema adaptación de la obra del fundador de la Iglesia de Cienciología es trágica en todos los sentidos, pero tengo que decir que la batalla final de civilizaciones es una estupidez tan desmesurada que es mucho incluso para mí, y después de una hora y media de aburrimiento, significa una dosis de diversión. Y el uso de miniaturas contribuye en gran medida a ello. ()