El club de la Pelea
Fight Club
Fight Club
Director:
David FincherGuión:
Jim UhlsCámara:
Jeff CronenwethMúsica:
The Dust BrothersReparto:
Edward Norton, Brad Pitt, Helena Bonham Carter, Meat Loaf, Jared Leto, Zach Grenier, Holt McCallany, Eion Bailey, Richmond Arquette, David Andrews (más)Streaming (4)
Sinopsis(1)
Un joven solitario con insomnio, una vida sin intenciones aparentes, y que basa su felicidad en el consumismo descubre que asistiendo a reuniones de enfermos anónimos de diversa gravedad consigue volver a conciliar el sueño. Casualmente, en uno de sus múltples vuelos por motivos de trabajo conoce a un vendedor de jabón llamado Tyler Durden, el cuál hace que se replanté todo su sistema de valores. Entre los dos crean el Club de la Lucha, que consiste en gente desconocida que se pelea entre sí por el placer de hacerlo. Pronto este club se convierte en algo mucho más complejo e importante, y empieza a crecer hacia objetivos más ambiciosos. (20th Century Fox España)
(más)Videos (3)
Reseñas (10)
A los dieciocho, cuando estaba enfadado con el sistema y me molaban los Doors (la música) y Pulp Fiction (la película), El club de la lucha sería la película de mi vida. Pero hoy en día no creo que no pudiera ser una estrella de cine si realmente lo deseara e hiciera todo lo posible por ello. Y ya he aprendido a moverme por el sistema. Lo cual es razón suficiente para que piense que esta película es simplemente una gilipollez filmada de forma muy espectacular.
()
The most indigestible, but intellectually and thematically the most charged and perhaps the most seductive Fincher's film for someone. And after mature consideration, also my favorite. Anarchy, fights, and at times hopeless situations, depression, and despair. But above all, life in it! Living energy of all characters at any time of the day, night, or person at any time.
()
The genius directing by David Fincher plays the main role in Fight Club, being able to keep up with the anarchically crazy literary manifestation by Palahniuk against the current lifestyle of western society. Someone else who contributed a lot toward the excellent result was Jim Uhls, who adapted the book into a screenplay that could be used to make a movie. Unarguably, the book is a stronger experience, but the movie also has much to offer, thanks to the actors, the technical side and, primarily, Fincher’s playfulness. On the other hand, the original book isn’t one of the best things ever to have trickled out of Palahniuk’s sick mind.
()
An undisguised anarchist tinge of unapologetic shitting on the system? A satire on the emergence of terrorist groups seemingly based on good intentions? The hidden desires of a young man who wants to be something he can't be? Maybe none of it and maybe all of it together? In this case, I don’t care. The fact is that this is a brilliant piece of filmmaking with lots of great moments and food for thought. Fincher kicks ass.
()
This is the richest interpretive film I know. Is it a critique of consumerism, a satire on the far-right and anarchist associations at the same time, or just a provocative thriller about the need for violence? Maybe all of it. In any case, it takes a good bit of genius to make it not look, through its shiny facade, like an angry young generation that wants to save the world with rocks in their hands, but rather like a serious ancient philosopher who has it all figured out to the last detail. It was a breakthrough life film for when I was in my 20s, and a decade later it’s (only) a fantastic cinematic ride without compromises, reflecting the end of the 1990s like few other things.
()
Anuncio