Jack Reacher: Nunca vuelvas atrás

Zwick took it differently and badly. He seems to have abandoned the main strengths of the first one and serves us a second story of an agent with a mysterious past with a minimal portion of insight, which, however, does not so much play the main role, but only in details dilutes the damn serious note, which is itself the biggest criminal cliché in recent times. Unfortunately, even the screenwriting and framing of the story is first-rate Hollywood cynicism and dullness. In other words, you get all the ills that scripts for ordinary action films have, and as a result, all the twists and attempts fizzle out in the end. It's partly saved by the usually top-notch action Zwick has always been good at, but you'll still miss the slow, frantically unedited brawl from the first episode. Cruise is great, the family element is questionable and brings down the overall rating. After the first one, which caused a solid fan breakdown and there was talk of another agent like Bond and Hunt, came a cold shower and who knows what will happen with the third film. (23.10.2016)

This is a confirmation of the preconception that Zwick has a mastery of kitschy, visually-based, epic stories, but in terms of the thriller genre, he pretty much misses the mark with everything. The first half-hour is pure goodness, as Jack Reacher rides the wave of comedy, with Cruise acting with gusto and outdoes every genre film of recent times with his wit. But when everyone gets serious, when the parental dilemma and the criminal plot take over, Zwick proves pretty clueless, making it look like a bargain-basement spy drama that sort of carefully takes from everywhere but fails to find its own image all the way to the end. The first film was not great in terms of plot, but it captivated me with its unique old-world guy feel. This is filmmaking timelessness that would have fallen into the average in any decade. Much is actually saved by Cruise himself, who for perhaps the first time in his career is seen to have really aged. And surprisingly, also by Cobie Smulders, who has broken free from the snares of television and the comic book cult and projects a surprising amount of feminine charm and military charisma into an interchangeable character. I want a more distinctive director for the third film. PS: The airport check-in is a unique filmmaker lapse of logic. (19.10.2016)

The first installment of Jack Reacher didn’t dazzle me in any way, even though the action scenes were one of the best I’ve seen in the last few months. I tried the second installment to see if anything had improved. And it didn’t. Quite the opposite. There is less action and Jack Reacher is still the same unavailable guy and the worst character Tom Cruise has ever portrayed. And that’s despite the fact that the screenwriter invented a supposed daughter for him and tried to make the second installment a little more personal. It didn’t work and truthfully, it was worse than I thought. (28.06.2017)

A decent sequel. It’s obvious that Reacher is Tom’s favorite character. Rough as sand paper, a bit of a bull in a china shop, but a clever vet who always has the situation under control. Seeing part 1 encouraged me to read the series of books, so the much denied height disparity really bothers me, but also I’m surprised that he only makes films according to the inferior books in the series. I thought Never Go Back was just average (it disappeared from my mind terribly fast), and the only interesting storyline was with the kid. This made the movie an even more pleasant surprise. The brisker story, loads of old-school type action and great lines. Even the road trip moments work excellently. A pleasant return to the nineties. Tom is beginning to show his age, so he’s a bit puffy after the Men, but he convincingly walks all over the younger competition in fights, beating them hands down. A really fine ending. In terms of acting, well done. I hope Reacher earns enough for another sequel. These movies are evergreens, not box-office hits, but the type of movie you can watch more times during your life than many an Oscar-winner. (20.10.2016)

Jack doesn’t waste time. Before the movie even starts, he manages to pacify two guys and bring two more to justice before the opening credits, during which he manages to set up a date with a woman he has only just met. Roughly the first third of the film is a terrific lesson in narrative economy. Neither the characters, who take action instead of making unnecessary speeches, nor the viewers have time to breathe. The only thing that slows Reacher down is the second woman who enters the story, because of whom the protagonist must not only flee from justice and search for the real villain, while at the same time acting as a responsible father figure and giving instructive advice, which does not fit his type of pulp hero at all. Furthermore, the relationships between the characters lack the necessary dynamics due to their weak development and the bland actors who portray them (though the characters are allegedly one of the main reasons the filmmakers chose Never Go Back over approximately twenty of Child’s other books as the source material), so you will have plenty of time to ponder the predictability of the mediocre plot in comparison with the brisk beginning. If you try, you can easily guess how a given scene will turn out. If you try a little harder, you will have no trouble deducing how the whole film will end. As a fine bonus, I welcome the fact that the relationship between Turner and Reacher remains on a professional level (its nature is nicely demonstrated by the fact that neither of them addresses the other’s semi-nudity as they inspect their ragged wounds). The only narrative betrayal, which partially justifies the weakness of the relationship storyline, comes at the very end, when it is necessary to clean the slate and the restore the status quo so that the franchise can continue without disruption. In comparison with the more diligent McQuarrie, Zwick merely fulfilled his commission. A cruel price is paid for this particularly by the interchangeable, quickly and vaguely edited action scenes (only the sound effects provide any kind of orientation), none of which comes close to the bathroom brawl or car chase from the first film. In an era of recycling tried-and-true franchises and making exorbitantly expensive comic book adaptations, I appreciate the fact that someone is taking on a mid-budget 1990s action thriller in which the plot plays a bigger role than spectacular CGI sequences. It may not be so apparent from that how little effort most of those involved put into the attempt to make something worth remembering. Two days after the screening, I’m not sure whether I saw a new Tom Cruise movie or commercials for Washington’s public transportation system and the sports cars that American cops drive. The first Jack Reacher made the most money outside of cinemas (DVD, Blu-ray, VoD). The second one seems to have been intended from the start as a movie to be watched on trains and planes. And that’s a shame. 65%. (20.10.2016)