Flaskepost fra P
Flaskepost fra P
Flaskpost från P
Director:
Hans Petter MolandGuión:
Nikolaj ArcelCámara:
John Andreas AndersenMúsica:
Nicklas SchmidtReparto:
Nikolaj Lie Kaas, Fares Fares, Pål Sverre Hagen, Jacob Lohmann, Amanda Collin, Johanne Louise Schmidt, Jakob Oftebro, Signe Mannov, Søren Pilmark (más)Sinopsis(1)
Una antiguo mensaje es encontrado en una botella en Escocia tras un largo viaje a través del océano. La nota es difícil de descifrar, pero cuando el investigador danés del departamento Q lo consigue, tratará junto a su particular equipo de resolver otro diabólico caso abandonado a pesar de que las huellas de este prácticamente han desaparecido. (Vértigo Films Esp.)
(más)Reseñas (7)
La primera mitad rutinaria y poco sorprendente se convierte en la segunda mitad dura, tensa y oscura a la velocidad del tren. Y esta nos complace mucho. El malvado está bien, un Edward Norton más débil, pero no es tan bueno como el dúo de canallas de la segunda parte. La tercera no tiene la complejidad de la segunda (Profanación (Los casos del Departamento Q)), se queda ligeramente por encima de la primera (Misericordia: Los casos del departamento Q), es decir, una muy buena película de su género.
()
I intentionally watch the movie adaptations of Jussie Adler-Olsen’s novels on TV. There are so many Scandinavian crime movies that it is quite nice to make things easier with some movie series. And with this one, I always had to get used to the main characters in the beginning, so that I could really enjoy the story afterward. But here, it is a little more complicated. Here, Carl Mørck actually looks as if he had a pineapple up his ass during the whole movie and he drops a solid piece of wisdom at the end of the whole film. Assad at least expresses a few emotions and his character salvages a lot. Fortunately, the movie has a very decent atmosphere and an absolutely ultimate psychopath in the form of Pål Sverre Hagen so you can be sure that each of you will find certain moments interesting. But overall, I was disappointed. I put the movie on about 5 times and I truly finished it only on my 5th try. I don’t know a beginning of a Scandinavian crime movie more lukewarm than this one.
()
Moland finally directed a film out of it and not an expensive pilot of a series. Black humor was added, which it lacked a lot. Unfortunately, in an attempt to remove a rather procedural model of twists and conflicts, he turned the second half of the film into a slightly absurd and illogical spectacle. The discomfort is further enhanced by the performance of Pål Sverre Hagen, whose monster is a rather awkward mixture of pederast and the square root of Javier Bardem.
()
A Conspiracy of Faith is a film of two completely different parts. I don't know if they are equally long, because subjectively the exposition of the story seemed too slow and about as exciting and captivating as a Christian documentary. The movie theater screen should help the film, but somehow I hesitated and thought that a television screen would be more than enough for this. But then came the scene where the ransom for the kidnapped siblings is supposed to be handed over on the train, and suddenly it looks as if a cyclist staggering somewhere at the tail end of the peloton realizes that he doesn't want to stay last and gives it his all. The dynamics change incredibly and suddenly you understand what the magic and global success of Scandinavian crime is all about. You have a jam-packed spectacle that does not spare any blood or shocking twists, and it engulfs you completely. But when the end credits start, you begin to think and certain doubts arise about the errors in logic that you didn't notice before. It's somewhere between 3 and 4 stars, but in the case of such highly-rated films, I usually choose a lower rating. The acting is decent and the subject matter is also unconventional, but the mistakes are simply noticeable. Overall impression: 65%.
()
El mensaje en una botella sigue siendo la entrega más exitosa de la serie de libros del Departamento Q, no podía separarme del libro y literalmente volaba por encima de las líneas. Como fanático tanto de los libros como de las películas, era consciente de lo difícil que debe ser trasladar el tercer libro a la pantalla grande. Y mis preocupaciones se cumplieron: sentí que estaba viendo una historia completamente diferente o que los cineastas seleccionaron pasajes potencialmente emocionantes y los juntaron en la película. El resultado es una catástrofe y le doy una estrella solo porque, de hecho, se confirmó que El mensaje en una botella no puede ser filmado, por lo tanto, es necesario apreciar el esfuerzo. Por otro lado, creo firmemente que Expediente 64 será una bomba cinematográfica, es perfecta para su adaptación, ya puedo ver la historia desarrollándose en dos líneas temporales...
()
The third installment of Olsen’s series has the best film adaptation so far. I tried to watch the film as if I hadn't read the book. I enjoyed a quality crime thriller set in a community of religious fanatics with a grim atmosphere and a convincing villain. Nikolaj Lie Kaas as Detective Morck was absolutely brilliant. His rendition of a man whose life treats him like shit every single day was simply perfect. Even though I knew how the film was going to end from the book, I got a proper dose of suspense. I'm looking forward to Journal 64.
()
Nikolaj Lie Kaas was a truly excellent choice for the main role because his grim face and minimalism go well with a character that you're not sure whether is brilliant or simply unsure. There are certain inconsistencies or rather unnecessary elements in the film, which were taken from the book to avoid further trimming - for example, the "mistress" of the killer doesn't have much justification in the film. Nevertheless, it is still an excellent thriller that will send chills down your spine.
()