In Good Company (algo más que un jefe)

In Good Company is a laid-back, sophisticated and tasteful “comedy from life” with great actors and one beautiful love scene. (18.07.2005)

Weitz brothers, the hopeless American Pie is definitely forgiven. Actually, that was after their previous effort, About a Boy, and now they've proven once again that perhaps they have a patent on smart, witty entertainment that comes so handy in today's comedic deluge of toilet humour and teen stupidity. This film has a lot in common with the excellent About a Boy, a smart script devoid of any clichés, a nice decent soundtrack and great performances by all involved (the little known Topher Grace was a pleasant surprise). And on top of that, an unusual conclusion by Hollywood standards. Very nice entertainment. (29.10.2005)

An undemanding comedy for the demanding - that might sound a bit odd, but it's the simplest definition of a film that effortlessly satisfies the refined tastes of ardent cynics who enjoy taking jabs at comedies revolving around the central theme of a sharp confrontation between two generations. Paul Weitz directed a very restrained work by American standards, filled with cleverly written screenplay. While its basic storyline may remind one of anything from the previously mentioned genre, the witty dialogues, intelligently crafted plot by the director, and most importantly, top-notch performances from the actors elevate this film above the "others." The encounter between Dennis Quaid and Topher Grace, as well as the chemistry between Topher Grace and Scarlett Johansson, create a unique and delightful ensemble of performances that is a joy to watch. While searching my memory for a similar film that I enjoyed so much, even a telescope might not be enough, as it's been a long time. And all the more I’ll remember this one. (05.08.2005)

Something completely different than what the trailer promised and unfortunately surprisingly forgettable spectacle. The rivalry between the young boss and the experienced matador occasionally falls into unnecessary moralizing, and Scarlett enters the scene unnecessarily late, so the love story doesn't have a chance to gain any significant depth. That very likable trio of actors then try almost in vain. I have an idea of what Paul Weitz wanted to tell, but it seems to me that he may not have known how to finish his story. And it's a shame because a pleasant, funny mood is present at times. (21.09.2005)

In Good Company surprises above all by being, in contrast to the majority of current American comedy productions, somewhat measured and cultivated. It simply does not feature the typical adolescent or coarse humor, and the whole film seems to appeal more to adult audiences who otherwise prefer watching TV. It is not a top-notch film because the humor contained in it is not so finely tuned, but everything is decently written, cast, and acted. The film remains within the realm of American major productions, meaning no major experiments or provocations, only light social criticism that does not come close to the impact of, for example, Up in the Air. However, it has a surprising ending that deviates from the traditional template of romantic happy endings. The romantic storyline, mainly due to the presence of Scarlett Johansson, who is made for this kind of genre film, somewhat overshadows the comedy. Overall impression: 65%. (07.11.2010)

A pleasantly sincere, gentle and calm semi-romantic comedy, which was surprisingly not so much about romance (I guess). I was pleasantly surprised by the ending, which on the one hand was typically Hollywood sweet, but on the other hand... You know what I mean. Lots of "real life" situations, pleasant humor, emotions that feel genuine... It was good. But I liked the similar and newer film Smart People (again with Dennis Quaid) even more. (07.04.2013)

I previously gave four stars to this movie because, aside from its subtle humor, I appreciated the overall kindness it exuded. Fast forward, some time has gone by, I've evolved, and today I caught a rerun with a fresh perspective. It dawned on me that, unlike other aspects, the pervasive kindness in the film wasn't some natural charm but a strategic move by the creators. However, it didn't resonate with me this time around. I'm not slamming it as a terrible film, just saying it didn't stand out. It played out as a standard comedy that delivered amusement within its limits, but what struck me as genuine and human back in the day now feels contrived and targeted at naive viewers. It didn't disappoint, but it failed to leave an impression. / Lesson learned: Some experiences can no longer be gained today. (03.11.2022)