Elizabeth: La Edad de Oro

No esperes un drama intimista con personajes retratados al detalle como en la primera entrega. Prepárate para atajos de palomitas de maíz, brillo superficial en forma de hermosos disfraces y ordeño contundente de las emociones de la audiencia. Muchos personajes obviamente importantes desaparecen antes de que el espectador se dé cuenta de quiénes eran. Y los dos únicos personajes que tienen sentido en la historia (y están bien interpretados) son los villanos interpretados por Jordi Mollà y Samantha Morton. El director Shekhar Kapur es mucho mejor con la oscuridad que con la luz y debería probar suerte con las películas de terror. Lo único que hacen oses Cate Blanchett y Clive Owen es adoptar poses elegantes. Me temo que esta película originalmente era más larga y solo podemos adivinar si se redujo porque la química inexistente entre Blanchett y Owen (el principal defecto de la película) no se vio favorecida por las escenas adicionales, o simplemente por razones comerciales, para el público consumidor. En cualquier caso, en esta versión final, «la rápida», está más cerca de El rey Arturo de Bruckheimer que de la Elizabeth original. (16.10.2007)

Nice set designs, gorgeous dresses and a great Cate Blanchett unfortunately does not a good movie make. The script is still quite crucial, and if it is not exactly simple in terms of the historical events portrayed, then it is very important to consider to what detail the creators want to go here. And they decided to go into such detail that I was emotionally absolutely detached and the only moment where one of my eyelids moved a little was the ending, where Clive Oven would have made even a statue cry. At the first glance, the viewer may think that the film may not be so bad a period drama, but unfortunately all that glitters is not gold. (11.10.2019)

As much as Clive Owen has an overwhelming charisma and his gaze makes more than one viewer's knees buckle, his character of Sir Raleigh is nothing but big popcorn indulgence, and his finger-licking love affairs (with both Bess and Elizabeth) turn the film into a soap opera. It called for more medieval darkness, dirt, rawness and backstage intrigue (which made the previous episode so interesting) and less implausible sugarplums. Cate Blanchett is initially superb, but over time, as the atmosphere thickens and the clouds gather over England, her Elizabeth becomes affected, theatrical and, for me, not very believable. The result is average, neither a full-fledged historical film nor an exciting probe into Elizabeth's soul and her inner feelings. (02.02.2008)

Queen Elizabeth II. Or rather, Elizabeth the First, Kapur’s "part two". Bess’s life story is so abundant, and offers a number of perspectives and can easily withstand the overwhelming quantity of adaptations that have emerged in the last couple of years. An opulent (and how opulent!), but intimate picture, shot in such a way that it seems as it was painted by the Dutch masters. And up until the execution (oops, spoiler alert) of Mary Stuart it is an amazing movie in every sense possible. But then it shifts toward the conflict with the Spanish Armada and Kapur starts to overindulge the kitschy slow motion shots of all kinds of things fluttering, waves crashing, bosoms heaving, uplifting speeches and so on. Luckily he has Cate Blanchett to back him up, who could be able shoulder two hours of completely still footage. (27.02.2009)

A big historical film that doesn’t know what it wants to be. On the one hand there are attempts at some sort of psychological storyline that often fall flat due to situations that are either awfully unfitting for a concept like this, or with a logic that is very misguided. As a result, the characters lose all their humanity, the viewer can get under the skin of the heroes, which is why some emotional outbursts en up causing laughter. On the other hand, for pure popcorn fun, there isn’t enough action. The camera and the direction also feel quite schizophrenic, in a sea of utterly unoriginal scenes, you get glimpses of something that with a bit of ambition could be called a signature, but alas, these are only exceptions. All this makes Elizabeth: The Golden Age nothing but an average historical film that is saved from total catastrophe mostly by the good actors. Kapur should try making a smaller genre piece. (14.10.2008)