Independence Day: Contraataque

¿Alguien todavía disfruta de esto, hoy, en la era de los Interestelares, Gravedades y Marcianos? En comparación con el original que ya tiene veinte años (!), no hay un adelanto de tendencia, solo que todo se multiplica: la cantidad de personajes, cazas, el tamaño de las naves espaciales, la cantidad de presidentes y sus discursos, coloreados por música patriótica. Aunque la acción con trucos buenos y bien ruidosa comienza rápido, dura 100 minutos y es más densa que en la primera película, TODO en ella es «prestado» de alguna parte y NO hay NINGÚN elemento innovador en toda la película. Lo que más sufrimiento me causó a mí fueron los personajes, los diálogos y la estupidez sin disimular, que en los noventa puede haber parecido divertida y genial, ¿pero hoy?! El momento más brillante de esta película para mí fue el eclipse final antes de los créditos finales y la llegada del famoso motivo musical de Arnold. (27.06.2016)

“They like to get the landmarks.” Though it would have been good for it, Emmerich’s new movie doesn’t contain many more similarly prescient lines, and it does show any awareness of its own bullshit. The gravity with which the subject matter, reminiscent of a 1950s sci-fi B-movie, is handled gives one an idea of what Starship Troopers would have looked like if Verhoeven had taken it seriously. With a guilelessness that’s as endearing as it is disturbing, the new Independence Day turns the message of the Cold War-era The Day the Earth Stood Still on its head. A more advanced civilisation is not here to warn humanity of the risk of self-destruction, but to help it destroy the enemy. The purpose of war is not for people to learn from it, but to better prepare themselves for the next war, because without warfare the military-industrial complex would logically collapse. Solutions other than military force are not even considered and the effectiveness of using hard power (even against an ally) is not in any way questioned by the film’s message. It doesn’t explain why society was divided, but mainly shows that society was united by waging war. Military conflicts thus essentially have a positive effect, even if they usually result in a few major cities getting wiped off the face of the earth. Even though I am disgusted by the ideology that the film expresses (not to mention the character of the exceedingly incompetent president), and though its sentimentality and patriotism sometimes exceed the tolerable limit, I enjoyed the second Independence Day as much as I did the first one. In terms of composition, it is a perfect summer blockbuster in which every motif and every character has its own justification (and the extended exposition thus bears fruit later in the film). The multitude of characters allows Emmerich to change the point of view as needed and thus share with us information that is necessary to keep us in the picture while wanting to know more (by the time we get to the climax, we sense that there will be a snag, as all of the plot lines have not been resolved yet). The film is brilliantly paced throughout, including at the level of individual action scenes. The deadline that we are continually warned about comes ever closer, the aliens get bigger and stronger, the number of important characters in peril increases. The $200 million budget is evident and the battles are massive, but neither would matter if the action wasn’t a solid part of the narrative, helping to move the story along by eliminating certain obstacles and creating others. If you are going to make a big, dumb and not very original sci-fi flick, then do it with the storytelling skill found in Resurgence. 80% (21.06.2016)

I am not entirely sure what the viewers in the USA expected. The sequel to Independence Day went to the absolute human extremes that we, as the viewers would never have imagined. This means that Roland Emmerich outdid himself once again and he painted a future involving aliens and all that comes with it. The most striking thing of it all is American patriotism that is literally gushing from every single scene. If he were to add that the film is being broadcast on TV America to a hundred and fifty countries of the world, where they interrupted all programming only to show this, nobody would have been surprised. On the other hand, I am a bit disappointed that Roland isn’t able to poke some fun at himself and that he didn’t turn this film into a sequel to Starship Troopers. As far as the screenplay is concerned, there was certainly hope for that. But he did manage to prepare a perfect digital visual that saves him wherever possible and that managed to save the rest of the film as well. That is actually the only thing that ensures the quality of this movie and that elevates it to the level of at least your standard Emmerich movie. So what was it that we actually wanted? (10.05.2017)

Emmerich remakes his own work while managing to rip off about ten other films, sprinkles in cheesy lines, pathetic speeches, and huge monumental action that casually outdoes every orgy of destruction from any action film of the last three years (which is a major asset!). It’s really just 1990s stuff. But! Christ, did the first half-hour of introducing new characters really have to be that long? And the callous treatment of protagonists from the past? At a time when the studios allow 140 minutes for whatever, Emmerich's two hours are too tight, and his weakness is shown to be the lack of finesse in his shortcuts. But the monumental epic wins in the finale. Although it’s tight and quite ineffective, I've forgiven Emmerich for worse things. PS: When I want to think back to it two days later, all I can pull from my memory are high-five planets and new interplanetary ships. (23.06.2016)

The whole Independence Day: Resurgence felt a little lame. The first hour is downright boring and extremely rushed, a lot of things happen and a bunch of new characters are introduced, but those things aren't very important or spectacularly executed and you care less about the characters than you do about the Namibian regional elections. It's nice to see Bill Pullman and Jeff Goldblum in action after all these years, but it's impossible to say that their presence makes the second Independence Day a better film. If they thought we'd applaud the excitement of seeing a heroic president and a likeable nerd save the world years later, they miscalculated. Independence Day really isn't about the characters, so there's not much point in revolving around them for an hour. It's boring. The action does kick in in the second half, but honestly Roland Emmerich has made more interesting stuff, and pulling a Chinese big city and then dropping it on London no longer impresses in the blockbuster universe. This and the aerial battles and the finale on the ground are fine, but none of it is interesting enough to help the film get out of the "pretty OK summer sci-fi washout" box. Unlike the first film, there's a woeful lack of wit, workable pathos, and most of all, those one-dimensional but still likeable heroes you'd root for. Here, you have either anonymous characters bullshitting or quite effectively but not extravagant action. It doesn't hurt in the cinema, but I'm looking in vain for a reason to see it a second time. (15.05.2017)