Windtalkers

Incluso como película de acción sencilla pero efectista (véase Broken Arrow: Alarma nuclear), Windtalkers sería demasiado lenta y pesada para los tiempos que corren. Pero esta película de acción no quiere ser sencilla y mezcla espíritus indios y humanismo con disparos y explosiones. Tanto que el resultado sabe a manzana podrida. Esa espiritualidad de los indígenas es, en realidad, bastante poco fiable y contrasta con las interesadas escenas de acción heroica (planos a cámara lenta de Nicolas Cage tras sus exitosas acciones unipersonales). Y todo el nivel humanístico de la película también choca con el egoísmo de las escenas de acción, que también se ve afectado por el concepto de los japoneses como una raza condenable. En definitiva, ni una gran acción al estilo de Black Hawk derribado, ni «algo más» al estilo de Salvar al soldado Ryan. Aquí alguien o no sabía lo que quería rodar o simplemente lo hizo mal. (19.08.2002)

John Woo is a director of action films and clearly does not feel comfortable in any other genre. War, in his interpretation, lacks sufficient impact. The only, but crucial, problem is that he behaves as if he is shooting his next action masterpiece and tries to insert almost balletic scenes into the film, which, however, have no chance of appealing to me when it comes to the soldiers who have just been killed. The brutal dose of detachment, characteristic of his previous works, only seems ridiculous here. When the main hero in The Killer or Hard Boiled stands against multiple adversaries, it is exaggerated but also stylish. But when Nicolas Cage charges into the trenches like an unguided missile in Windtalkers and starts mowing down enemies without receiving any harm, I can only shake my head. Moreover, the Japanese are portrayed as complete idiots here, popping out of hiding with their weapons lowered and their hands flailing, running directly in front of American cannons. The refined form and planes passing by the camera or a series of exploding tanks take your breath away. However, the content is desperately trivial. 50% (08.07.2007)

I'm pretty disappointed in this. Pretty much. The action doesn't have the bite that the other John Woo films have, Nicolas Cage doesn't really fit, and the story of Christian Slater and Roger Willie was much better and more emotional than the story of the main characters. If I wanted to compare it to Woo’s Hong Kong work, it would be even less so. As it is, it's a slightly above average war movie and a big step down in John Woo's career. (06.08.2002)

A solidly directed film that became a huge flop. It’s hard to say what went wrong. Perhaps it needed a better script, but what it certainly lacks is at least one scene that would grab the viewer by the heart, though some scenes, especially the ones that present the Indians more closely, e.g. while making music, are sensitively filmed. And Nicolas Cage? He's not a bad actor, I can easily believe him as a soldier, but he is, let's face it, a bit jaded of late and doesn't have the potential to help hold a film commercially anymore. (30.11.2002)