El sicario de Dios

Una película épica de ciencia ficción de clase B que me atrajo sin ningún problema al mundo del cine imaginario retratado con entusiasmo, que tiene una escenografía agradable, vestuario capturado espectacularmente y motocicletas pasando a través de áridos desiertos, y la omnipresente atmósfera oscura y gótica. El sicario de Dios se parece más a un cómic que la mayoría de las adaptaciones cinematográficas de los cómics. No me importa que se trate de una combinación de los conocidos mundos de Blade Runner y Mad Max, complementada llamativamente con una acción de Matrix, porque se nota la pasión del director por lo que hace y su admiración no disimulada por los clásicos mencionados. La historia es correctamente directa y rápida, a veces con huecos, en algunas partes atenta a la continuidad de los detalles con los que una megapelícula de clase A no se preocuparía. Los personajes de los predicadores Bettany y Maggie Q salieron bien, al igual que la química entre ellos. La música de Young es excelente, añade un impulso infernal a la película. Si todo suena demasiado positivo, es porque obtuve mucho más de lo que esperaba después de las reseñas que había leído. (14.09.2011)

Scott Charles Stewart didn’t learn anything from Legion and delivers another piece of incredible bullshit with a serious face. This film is 100% immune to being taken seriously. It’s clear that the director wanted to make something cool and badass, but failed spectacularly. It’s so easy to ridicule that it doesn’t even bring any pleasure, its stupidity is just annoying. There’s one cliché after the other, it lacks all logic, and the script doesn’t have any surprises (the silly shocking twist at the end will be clear to anyone who has ever watched at least a couple of films or one soap opera). It pissed me off even more than Legion because I paid 109 CZK for Priest ticket and got wet on the way back home. (13.05.2011)

I can follow up on the end of my comment for Legion, where I said that the director should throw away the Bible and the special effects software because he’s not very good at either. Priest just adds to that because I haven't seen such misery, which layers desperately unimaginative action scenes (the most annoying series of slow-motion sequences of the year!) into a horribly illogical and uninteresting whole, since... well, since Legion. I feel a bit sorry for Paul Bettany, who goes all in, this time joined by Karl Urban. Yet the rest of the film simply ruins things, which beats even the last drop of the audience’s effort to watch it as a completely dumbed-down post-apocalyptic B-movie with vampires. Pushing such "shit" in theatres in 3D is bold - asking for admission is audacious. (10.06.2011)

Bland and flavorless, no suspense, cliché upon cliché that you can't even digest properly because the movie just won't let you, Cam Gigandet can't act, and the ending is a waste. The music didn't impress either. And I kinda regret the money I paid for it. The action was slow, and it wasn’t really any good. The vampires weren't that great, either. It's just a very, very weak film. Somehow, after sleeping it off, I can't even remember what (if anything) I enjoyed about it... (14.05.2011)

Better than Legion, but not by much. Technically, I had no reservations (except for the bungled fight with the hive guard), I liked the individual scenes and ideas, but together it didn't work. I was probably most annoyed by the pitifully small amount of space given to Karel Urban, whose villain would certainly have deserved a bigger exhibition. The whole thing (except for the music and visuals) looks like a classic B-movie, but I doubt the filmmakers wanted to make something like this. Two and a half stars. (07.06.2011)