La leyenda de Tarzán

A pesar de que algunos de los motivos probablemente están tomados de varias secuelas del libro original, la trama de la película parece desesperadamente sacada de la nada y da la impresión de que los creadores no sabían cómo lidiar con ella. Como si la hubieran rodado tres directores con visiones diferentes, o como si el director David Yates quisiera rodarla de tres formas diferentes a la vez. La mezcolanza resultante es una combinación de Tarzán, una novela rosa muy al estilo de Memorias de África y una aventura que recuerda a Indiana Jones. Al mismo tiempo, la película carece de suspenso, acción bien capturada, humor y diversión. Por el contrario, no faltan los malos cortes y los trucos digitales de calidad fluctuante. Los actores han sido mal elegidos o actúan por debajo de sus posibilidades, o ambas opciones. El último rescate de los creadores sería argumentar que intentaron reproducir el malo e ingenuo ambiente de las novelas de aventuras de los años veinte y treinta, lo que explicaría muchas cosas. Pero aun así, sería una justificación bastante débil. (19.07.2016)

Alguien podrá disfrutar de esta basura como un placer culposo, pero a mí me molestaba más y más con cada minuto que pasaba. Al mismo tiempo, el inicio era muy prometedor. Favreau con su El Libro de La Selva lo superó con mucha ventaja. (03.07.2016)

Animals versus colonialism or the Swedish model makes Africa great again. When the creators are already pushing so hard on the racial and colonial aspect, the character of the scattered and theatrically very faint Aryan is very interesting, by which I do not want to suggest that anything from The Legend of Tarzan deserves to be taken seriously. Attempts at moralizing are as rigid as trying to tell two stories at once (both the "origin" and the new storyline drag on). Christopher Waltz could send his less talented double to the set to play the villainous roles, and David Yates confirms that he is a boring director, especially when the screenwriters don't give him brisk dialogues. Plus, it sometimes looks like some of the shots disappeared, so Samuel L. Jackson fires like a rich Texan. I can also forget that the film opens a meaningless amount of storylines and tells them very roughly, and sometimes not at all. Favreau didn't try a tenth of the "serious overlaps" in The Jungle Book, yet his film looks ten times more mature than this CGI nonsense. One then notices with fascination all the bullshit, such as the fact that a man living his whole life among gorillas is shaved like a real Dandy. Well, the nobleman's son won’t be denied. (21.01.2017)

At first I was surprised with the story itself. The thing is that the film does not offer the classical view of Tarzan’s life in the jungle, but it starts at a moment when Tarzan is already a cultivated and respectable English subject with an aristocratic past and the manners or a true elderly gentleman. The beginning seems really good and it is really entertaining. But after about half an hour, Tarzan sets off on a journey to his original homeland. There is a plot twist and the story goes back to its beginning. So once again Tarzan is flying around on endless lianas – a liana in one hand, the beautiful Jane in the other – and he’s fighting against British colonists. At that point, the excitement starts to wane and unfortunately it doesn’t get better again. It’s fine, but this movie doesn’t deserve more than three stars to be swung towards it on a liana. (15.12.2017)

Perfect casting, but a terrible digital mess. The biggest positives are Samuel L. Jackson, Christoph Waltz and Margot Robbie, and I was intrigued by the different retelling of Tarzan's story, but the visuals and the look of the digital animals might have pleased me in 2008, but today it looked a bit off to me, and the ending with the bison seemed like a bad joke. The action is also from a weaker barrel, Alexander Skarsgård is a bit too thin in the fights and we don't even hear the impact of the blows, which disappointed me, but on the other hand, it's at least entertaining and it's easy to watch without any deep disturbance. Jungle book will definitely be two levels better. 55% (04.08.2016)